Program - day 1 workshop 2
Title
Peer Review of Teaching for Promotion Purposes. Trialling the Documentation and Procedures Developed for an ALTC Project.
Presenters / facilitators
Geoffrey Crisp & Kerrie Le Lievre - Centre for Learning and Professional Development, University of Adelaide, Adelaide Australia
Objectives / outcomes
By the completion of the workshop participants will be able to:
- Use the peer review documentation developed as part of the ALTC project ‘Peer Review of Teaching for promotion Purposes’.
- Understand the complexities associated with summative peer review and the differences between using documentation for formative or summative reviews.
Staff involved in academic promotion processes; staff supporting and advising academics applying for promotion. Academic development staff and discipline-based teachers involved in staff development and learning and teaching improvement plans.
Geoffrey Crisp is the Director for the Centre for Learning and Professional Development at the University of Adelaide. Geoff is a HERDSA Fellow and ALTC Associate Fellow; he is the leader for the ALTC project on ‘Peer Review of Teaching for promotion Purposes’.
Kerrie Le Lievre is the project officer for two ALTC projects, the Peer Review project and the Research Skills Development project; Kerrie has a PhD in English Literature.
This session will present protocols and tools for summative peer review of classroom teaching and teaching portfolios. It will give participants the opportunity to test the training materials and documentation for peer review in a workshop setting.
| Workshop Phase | Duration |
|---|---|
| Welcome and overview of session | 5 mins |
| Distribution of Internal Peer Review documentation, brief introduction to the process | 5 mins |
| View DVD of teaching session | 5 mins |
| Fill in individual Internal peer review form | 15 mins |
| Group discussion: differences and similarities between reports, and the reasons for these. Discussion of assessment criteria and use of evidence. | 25 mins |
| Distribution of External Peer Review documentation, brief introduction to the process | 5 mins |
| Read exemplar of teaching portfolios/application for promotion | 15 mins |
| Fill in individual External peer review form | 15 mins |
| Group discussion: differences and similarities between reports, and the reasons for these. Discussion of assessment criteria and use of evidence. | 20 mins |
| Questions, comments, feedback. | 10 mins |
Download the full workshop plan (pdf)